Tag Archives: courts

When corporations make Life and death Policy: The Ongoing Healthcare debate

Who was Lorraine Bayless, the 87 year old women who died at a Bakersfield California assisted living center this week? Apparently she was just another number, at least that’s how it appears after a nurse for the corporately owned center refused to give CPR to Bayless despite the pleas of a 911 operator. So far no charges have been filed against either the company or the nurse, despite that this shows, or should show a fundamental disregard for human life and safety, let alone decency.

In a written statement, the executive director of Glenwood gardens, Jeffrey Toomer, defended the nurse’s actions. “In the event of a health emergency at this independent living community our practice is to immediately call emergency medical personnel for assistance and to wait with the individual needing attention until such personnel arrives.”

But just another number? Isn’t that a bit harsh. The company which owns Glenwood Gardens, Brookdale Senior Living, operates and owns a large network of assisted living centers across the nation. In fairness, there is not a pattern of neglect or inhumanity, such as the event that helped lead to Lorrainne Bayless’ death. A visit to Brookdale’s site indicates a commitment to senior care, but to a point. Their emergency care policy is that point.

Their website tracks t heir daily BKD common stock quote- an understandable priority for a company whose stated mission is to enrich “the lives of those we serve with compassion, respect, excellence andintegrity,” and to “put the resident first and foremost and the “bottom line” will take care of itself.” Brookdale’s management team indicates an emphasis on finance and profit.

In an open letter, Brookdale CEO T. Andrew Smith says that the company is “honored when a family entrusts us with the care of their loved one and we do not underestimate the importance of their choice for retirement living and senior living services, and that, “we make a positive difference in the daily lives of our residents is what fuels our commitment 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week.”

The State of California is also culpable for death. Legislators have nickel and dimed the Good Samaritan Law, part of Division 2.5 of California’s Health and Safety Code, which covers emergency medical services for the state. The provision reads:

1799.102. No person who in good faith, and not for compensation, renders emergency care at the scene of an emergency shall be liable for any civil damages resulting from any act or omission. The scene of an emergency shall not include emergency departments and other places where medical care is usually offered.
That would seem to paint Brookdale in the darkest possible light, at least in the case of Ms. Bayless. The California State Supreme Court in a 4-3 decision overturned an appellate case allowing a women, apparently paralyzed when a good Samaritan pulled her from a car believed in imminent danger of exploding, to sue her rescuer. The law also excludes “emergency departments and other places where medical care is usually offered.”

Lorraine Bayless, in the bureaucratic trap between lawyers, the courts and corporate liability, became a number to be weighed in terms of potential financial loss. There was no opportunity for doctors to have any say in that voice. As this country continues to struggle with how to handle healthcare, it must accept two glaring traps that are inconsistent with life, caregiving, and life and death decisions. The first is over-reaching interference by the legal system in cases not dealing directly with criminal behavior, demonstrable incompetence or neglect. In the case of Lorraine Bayless, the facts are clear that any attempt at CPR would have been rendered in the best possible faith.

Morally, it is reprehensible that a nurse and company would not render emergency life-giving care under such a circumstance. I have been in those situations, and have not hesitated and would not hesitate to offer care, regardless of feared legal repercussions. I can, however, understand the trepidation of losing a job in a difficult market with the potential of catastrophic financial ramifications on a family given the zeal of lawyers, the priority of avoiding financial liability by a corporation, and the cold adherence to legal interpretation by the courts. Personally, I would not recommend such a facility, nor would I hire such a nurse, but I understand those weights.

Finally, the skewed coverage regarding so-called “Obamacare” describes a system in which bureaucrats and “death panels+ would routinely make life and death decisions for people. This case reveals that we already have such a system in place. The nurse followed company policy-company policy. I’ll say it again. Company policy, and a woman died. Anyone who has argued with an insurance company over a bill understands it has nothing to do with what the doctor prescribed or thought best while looking in your ear or up your … It was all about the numbers, of which Lorraine Bayless sadly became. And that is the bottom line.

Catch 900poundgorilla’s WC Turck and Brian Murray each Sunday 8-9am only on Our Town with Mike Sanders, at Chicago’s Progressive Talk, WCPT AM and FM, and streaming online. Our Town is sponsored by HORA USA, at http://www.HORAusa.com. HORA is an evolutionary meditative practice for the whole body and mind. Take the next step in your personal evolution at http://www.HORAusa.com.

Friend us on Facebook at Revolution and Beer. And if you have a cause to champion, please let us know as we work to become the grassroots support network for Chicago Activists and community organizers.

Catch the beer of the week review with 900poundgorilla’s WC Turck and Brian Murray each Sunday 8-9am only on Our Town, at Chicago’s Progressive Talk, WCPT AM and FM, and streaming online. Friend us on Facebook at Revolution and Beer. And find all of the great beers we review each week at Louis Glunz Beer Inc., http://www.glunzbeers.com


Sometimes being at any way associated with the male gender is shameful…

Sometimes being associated with the male gender is a shameful experience. Ladies, at least you have  a choice,  for the other half of the population, it can be hell being stuck in this body. It seems like that feeling is happening more and more lately, from ridiculous statements from Missouri Senate candidates, to male crafted legislation to harass and violate women’s bodies, sometimes I wish there was a reasonable way to trade in my, shall I say, male apparatus.

Here is an AP  story from Santa Ana, California that adds further weight to the damn-near overwhelming argument against male assertions of being the “dominant” sex.

“Superior Court Judge Derek Johnson said if someone doesn’t want sexual intercourse, the body “will not permit that to happen…saying a rape victim didn’t put up a fight during her assault…The case involved a man who threatened to mutilate the face and genitals of his ex-girlfriend with a heated screwdriver before committing rape, forced oral copulation, and other crimes.”

When I was twelve I got pulled into this Evangelical fright fest, in which adults outright attempted to terrify children into their cult with outlandish tales about everything from how girls cutting their hair, to sex, drinking and dancing would put us on a path to the flesh burning eternally and painfully from our bodies in the soul-crushing pits of hell. I was already very into girls at that point, something that didn’t go unnoticed when I buddied up to a cute and also stunned girl in this little shop of biblical horrors. I was told by this almost outraged, red-faced evangio-path, “you know what girls have down there? Teeth that will bite your thing right off! And you know who controls those teeth? The lord! And you can’t hide from the Lord, either of you. He’s sees all!”

Needless to say, in appreciation for my parents, I knew this guy was a little off his rocker, but it did  start souring me to organized religion, and taught me that men come to fundamentalist religion-every religion-the same way men come to sex, with this deeply internalized and barely contained sense of rage and anger that is sometimes obsessive and not  at all healthy to the women and physical partners in their life. It comes  with this weird power that some men feel they must assert like a grenade, erupting in whatever direction it can. If a man feels trapped in a box, or crushed in powerlessness there seems  that tendency to pass their powerlessness to those  he feels are weaker in the most manipulative and abusive ways. And to be clear, I am not talking about all men, but it does reside in all of us to some degree. And guys, if you deny it, you are either kidding yourself, have not analyzed deep enough or are B.S.-ing the rest of us. 

So thank you to Judge Johnson for finally confirming what medical silence, and my experience with women through the years was unable to confirm. You’ve found the female jaws of chastity. Well done, you thick-skulled, cave-man throwback, you flaw of Darwinism and anti-evolutionary exclamation point.  

More from the AP  story:

“The California Commission on Judicial Performance issued a report Thursday saying Superior Court Judge Derek Johnson’s comments were inappropriate and a breach of judicial ethics. Johnson is a former prosecutor in the Orange County district attorney’s sex crimes unit.

Johnson issued some flimsy apology, saying that he was frustrated,  but curiously did not retract, correct or amend his original  statement. But I just want to apologize on behalf of men who try, despite the male body, and a far too hormone driven mentality, to at least attempt at something akin to progressive non-gender centered thought. And to god or who ever designed things this way, any place I can turn these things in, and no, it has nothing to do with that teeth thing!


%d bloggers like this: