Seeds of Revolution: part one

Notes from an upcoming book by WC Turck and BL Murray 

The origin of an idea, a movement or a revolution begins in the mind of an impassioned or oppressed individual. What characterizes and legitimizes it is one simple element: Community. Community is fundamental, and nothing binds a community like common cause, or common oppression, whether real, perceived or manufactured. This single fact is what the Tea Party, the Occupy movement, the Suffragists and even the National Socialists in 1930’s Germany share in common. The question becomes, can the fundamental tenants of those movements be expressed in predictable algorithms or reproducible marketing concepts to sell a better cola or promote the ultimate candidate, or manufacture a revolt based upon the whims of, say, a corporation or an individual?

By contrast, what is it that excites a revolution out of the languishing toleration that precedes a popular uprising? In Common Sense Thomas Paine wrote:

As a long and violent abuse of power is generally the means of calling the right of it in question, (and in matters too which might never have been thought of, had not the sufferers been aggravated into the inquiry,) and as the king of England hath undertaken in his own right, to support the parliament in what he calls theirs, and as the good people of this country are grievously oppressed by the combination, they have an undoubted privilege to inquire into the pretensions of both, and equally to reject the usurpations of either…

The cause of America is, in a great measure, the cause of all mankind. Many circumstances have, and will arise, which are not local, but universal, and through which the principles of all lovers of mankind are affected, and in the event of which, their affections are interested. The laying a country desolate with fire and sword, declaring war against the natural rights of all mankind, and extirpating the defenders thereof from the face of the earth, is the concern of every man to whom nature hath given the power of feeling; of which class, regardless of party censure, is


Philadelphia, Feb. 14, 1776.

It is important here to draw clear definitions, as well as distinctions between the Left and the Right, between Liberal and Conservative, and Liberal and Progressive. All have their stalwart(the opposing sides would call that the extremist wing) unwavering and often uncompromising constituencies. Each has its elitist hierarchy, primarily its political and financial leadership. It is here the fundamental difference between the Left and Right come practically into view. The elitist segment of the Left has far more in common with the elite Right than with its own far Left. Indeed, as was seen with support for the Iraq Invasion, or the Patriot Act, SOPA and many other prominent national issues, the elitist Left, though not in lock step with the Right tends to shadow it very closely. They both represent and drive aspects of the status quo.

The far Left tends to a more egalitarian design of society, eschewing the pseudo-cult of personality worship prevalent on the Right. The far Left was immediately critical of the Obama Administration over its flaccid response to the torture of Terror suspects during the Bush administration and its equivocation of Don’t ask don’t tell. They were vocally outraged at the continuation and expansion of  the Patriot Act under the Obama Administration, and deeply disappointed that Healthcare reform was not more aggressively pursued and that it did not go nearly far enough. On the other hand, the far Right looks to the elite Right for its marching orders from groups like the Heritage Foundation, FreedomWorks and the Tea Party, all constructions of the Elitist Right, funded by billionaire like the Koch Brothers. The truly idealistic Left is abandoned to its own initiatives, compelling progress on social, political, economic and Human rights issues purely through the sheer numbers it can bring to an issue, or through testing the extremes authorities will accede to without becoming nakedly unconstitutional or unlawful, or in teasing and probing boundaries at the fringes of the tolerance of the status quo.

About 900poundgorilla

W.C. Turck is a Chicago playwright and the author of four widely acclaimed books.His latest is "The Last Man," a prophetic novel of a world ruled by a single corporation. His first novel, "Broken: One Soldier's Unexpected Journey Home," was reccommended by the National Association of Mental Health Institutes. His 2009 Memoir, "Everything for Love" chronicled the genocide in Bosnia and the siege of Sarajevo. His third book "Burn Down the Sky" is published exclusively on Amazon Kindle. It was in Sarajevo at the height of the siege where he met and married his wife, writer and Artist Ana Turck. FOX NEWS, ABC, CBS News, the Chicago Tribune and The Joliet Herald covered their reunion after the war. He helped organized relief into Rwanda during the 1994 genocide. Turck has been a guest on WMAQ-TV, WLS in Chicago, WCPT, WBBM radio, National Public Radio, Best Of the Left and the Thom Hartmann show. He has spoken frequently on Human Rights, Genocide and Nationalism. In 2011, his play in support of the Occupy Movement, "Occupy My Heart-a revolutionary Christmas Carol" recieved national media attention and filled theaters to capacity across Chicago. He remains an activist to the cause of human rights and international peace. View all posts by 900poundgorilla

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: